Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader K Kavita came out of Tihar on Tuesday (August 27) at around 9.20 pm. As soon as she came out of Tihar, Kavita raised her hand and greeted everyone. After this, she directly hugged her son, during which Kavita looked emotional. After her son, she hugged her husband and brother. Coming out of Tihar, Kavita said, ‘I want to thank you all. I became emotional after meeting my son, brother and husband today after almost 5 months. Only politics is responsible for this situation. The country knows that I was put in jail. I did not make any mistake, I will fight. The law will prevail, the law will do its job. This was a flawed case.’ The Supreme Court today granted bail to Kavita in the cases of corruption and money laundering related to the Delhi liquor policy. The court said – the investigation in this case has been completed. The trial is not expected to be completed soon. K Kavita has been in jail for 5 months. She is a woman and should get bail under section 45 of PMLA. In many orders of this court, it has been said that under trial custody should not be converted into punishment. On July 1, the High Court rejected the bail petition. On July 1, Kavita went to Delhi High Court for bail. Then the court said that she is the main accused and the investigation is at a crucial stage. Bail cannot be granted right now. While granting bail, the Supreme Court also mentioned this decision of the High Court and commented on it. Kavita, daughter of former Telangana CM K Chandrashekhar Rao, was arrested by ED from Hyderabad on March 15. After this, CBI took her into custody on April 11. Kavita is the third big political leader to get bail in the Delhi liquor policy case. Before her, the Supreme Court has granted bail to Sanjay Singh and Manish Sisodia of Aam Aadmi Party in this case. Bail conditions 3 comments of the Supreme Court on bail 1. Being a woman, she should get special treatment: According to the law website Bar and Bench, while giving the verdict on Kavita, the Supreme Court cited section 45 under PMLA. Said that under this, being a woman, Kavita is entitled to special benefits. 2. Should an educated woman not get bail: The Supreme Court also mentioned the comment of the Delhi High Court, in which the High Court had said that a highly educated woman should not be entitled to special treatment under section 41. The Supreme Court said that after the order of the capable judge, such a notion was created that an educated woman should not get bail. What is this? The Supreme Court said – our opinion is the opposite. There should be no difference between a woman MP and a common woman. 3. Courts should be sensitive towards women: The Supreme Court said that the courts should be more sensitive in the case of women accused under PMLA. The capable judge of the High Court got confused while giving the verdict on Kavita’s bail under section 41. When did Kavita’s name come in the case, what is the charge? Read this news too… Kejriwal’s judicial custody extended till September 3 The judicial custody of CM Arvind Kejriwal has been extended till September 3 on Tuesday in the CBI case related to Delhi liquor policy. Kejriwal appeared in Rouse Avenue Court through video conferencing from Tihar Jail. He told the court that his sugar level is going down. That is why he has asked for permission to have lunch. CBI had demanded 14 days of judicial custody, but the court extended the custody by only one week. Read the full news…
Posted inNational