The Delhi High Court on Monday rejected the petition of Al-Qaeda terrorist Mohammad Abdul Rehman. The court said, ‘Brainwashing the youth with speeches and involving them in illegal activities against the country cannot be ignored just because no major terrorist incident has taken place.’ In fact, Mohammad Abdul Rehman was convicted by the trial court in February 2023 in a case related to the Unlawful Activity Prevention Act (UAPA) and sentenced to 7 years and 5 months. Rehman had appealed against this in the High Court. In the High Court, Rehman had argued that I was convicted of terrorist activity and involving people for it, but no evidence was found to prove that I have done anything like this. Rehman is accused of being associated with the Indian unit of the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda. During the arrest, fake documents and passport were found from him. The investigation also revealed that he had gone to Pakistan. The bench said – The court said – Rahman has close ties with the terrorist organization
The court said that Mohammad Abdul Rahman was in contact with people associated with Al-Qaeda. All of them were part of a larger network. Therefore, the trial court’s decision is upheld. These are the allegations on the network The bench also said these things in the decision The High Court said that such conspiracies do not require hidden activity, but declared terrorist organizations definitely get secret support. The plan to carry out terrorist activity can go on for many years. The court said that the motive of Section 18 of UAPA is to address such preparations. Even if there is no terrorist activity. Terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda in the Indian subcontinent operate in a very secretive manner. Its associates often do not leave any evidence. ………………………………. Also read these news related to Delhi High Court… Delhi HC said – Physical relationship does not mean sexual harassment: Evidence is needed to prove guilty; POCSO Act accused acquitted Delhi High Court while hearing a case under POCSO Act has said that use of the word physical relation with a minor victim cannot be considered sexual harassment. A bench of Justice Pratibha M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma acquitted the accused. He was sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court. Read the full news…
