Saif attack case- Accused Shariful’s face recognition test positive: Police said- the person seen in CCTV and the arrested person are the same, we have solid evidence

The face recognition test of Shariful Islam, the accused arrested in the attack on Saif Ali Khan, has come out positive. The face of the accused captured in the CCTV footage of Saif’s apartment has been found to be the same in this test report. Apart from facial recognition, the police had also sent the clothes worn by the accused at the time of the incident, weapons and equipment, a towel and a bag for forensic examination. 2 pictures of the day of the incident, in which the accused is seen Shariful’s father claims – the person seen in the CCTV is different Shariful’s father and his lawyer were constantly claiming that Saif’s attacker was someone else. It was being alleged that the police had arrested the wrong person. Meanwhile, the police had conducted a face recognition test to match Shariful’s face and the face of the accused captured in the CCTV. Mumbai Police told that the facial recognition test report has confirmed that Shariful Islam is the one who entered the actor’s house and stabbed him two weeks ago. Police said – We have solid evidence A senior police officer while giving information in the case said, ‘Apart from the facial recognition report, we have technical evidence like CCTV footage, mobile phone location and internet protocol details report, which proves that the arrested accused Shariful is the real accused. Accused Shariful is in judicial custody for 14 days Accused Shariful Islam was produced in Bandra Court on Wednesday (29 January) after his police custody ended. The court sent the accused to judicial custody for 14 days. That day the police said that investigation has revealed that the accused had done a recce of the place before the incident and had made complete preparations. The accused may have some more accomplices, whose investigation is going on. Also, the matter of sending money to Shariful’s relatives is also being investigated. Meanwhile, on Tuesday, Mumbai Police held a press conference regarding the attack on Saif Ali Khan. Additional Commissioner of Police Paramjit Singh Dahiya said, ‘We have arrested Shariful Islam in this case, he is the real accused.’ He told that we have many strong evidences against this accused. Dahiya also said that some reports are claiming that the fingerprints found from Saif’s house do not match with Shariful’s fingerprints. We are examining the fingerprints, we have not reached any conclusion yet. Saif Ali Khan was attacked at his house at 2 am on January 16. He had injuries on his hand, spine and back. He was treated for 5 days at Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai. Now read 5 statements related to this incident… Understand the whole story of the attack from 6 graphics Also read this news related to Saif… 1. Saif attack case-accused Shariful in 14-day judicial custody: Mumbai Police had said – the right accused is in custody, we have many strong evidences Shariful Islam, the accused who attacked Saif Ali Khan, was produced in Bandra Court on Wednesday (January 29) after his police custody ended. The court has sent the accused to 14 days judicial custody. Police said that investigation has revealed that the accused had done a recce of the place before the incident and had made complete preparations. Read full news… 2. A woman arrested from West Bengal in Saif Ali Khan attack case: The accused’s SIM was registered in her name; Fadnavis said – Media is creating confusion Mumbai Police on Monday arrested a woman from Nadia district of West Bengal in the Saif Ali Khan attack case. Sources say that investigation has revealed that the SIM used by Shariful, the accused arrested from Mumbai for the attack, was registered in the name of a woman. A two-member team of Mumbai Police reached West Bengal on Sunday. A West Bengal Police source told PTI – “Mumbai Police has arrested a woman from Chhapra in Nadia district in the Saif Ali Khan case. Read full news..

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *